CHOKSI OF INDIA CASE CONFIRMS THAT CITIZEN BY INVESTMENT (CBI) JURISDICTIONS; SUCH AS, ANTIGUA & BARBUDA ARE NOT RESPECTING THE LAW BEFORE ISSUING PASSPORTS

CHOKSI OF INDIA CASE CONFIRMS THAT CITIZEN BY INVESTMENT (CBI) JURISDICTIONS; SUCH AS, ANTIGUA & BARBUDA ARE NOT RESPECTING THE LAW BEFORE ISSUING PASSPORTS

User Rating: 3 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
 

The ongoing flap over how a prominent fugitive fraudster from India was granted a CBI passport last year by Antigua & Barbuda has just gotten worse. Reliable sources with expertise in the law of India have declared that Choksi's acquisition of a second passport was a violation of the Constitution, as India does not allow dual citizenship, under any circumstances.

The punishment for an Indian national obtaining dual citizenship is an automatic forfeiture of Indian citizenship, as well as other criminal penalties. Furthermore, every Indian passport always carries a printed warning to that effect. Readers are directed to the image appearing below:

This means that:


(1) The CIP unit in Antigua, which would have received the applicant's Indian passport, failed to even read it, because if they did, the warning that appeared therein would have required them to give the applicant written notice of the forfeiture of his Indian passport. Prudently, they should have rejected his application forthwith.

(2) The CIP unit obviously never checks local laws of applicants' jurisdictions, to ascertain whether the issuance of a CBI passport causes the applicant to violate the law. This leads me to believe that virtually all CBI applications are processed by clerks and secretaries and that in-house attorneys if they even exist, do not review applications. Even the most junior lawyer would have researched the law, before signing off on the applicant. Again, this is further evidence of zero due diligence.

Chronicles of Monte Friesner - Financial Crime Analyst  

Contributed by Kenneth Rijock - Financial Crime Consultant